Sunday, November 21, 2004

pp. 63 - 131. Summary and Thoughts

To recap the decision made in the comments field: Due to the Thanksgiving holiday and the general laziness caused thereby, we're pushing everything back a week. So 63-131 is now the reading for the week of 11/29. Now get blogging people.

Summary and thoughts for this week's reading.

Summary

Part II is more or less a description of France at length, with a few important interludes into Wyatt's life. Gaddis described everyday life in France, what he refers to as the "spectacle of culture fully realized." (64) Gaddis describes a collection of forged notes/autographs from historical entities, Cleopatra up through Newton (even though they were all written, improbably, in French). Gaddis describes the Sacre Coeur at length, calling it a monument to the "Jesuit victory over France." (66)

Wyatt has lived in Paris for three years, painting and restoring old paintings for money. Wyatt remains ignorant of the various art movements that swept post-War france, prefering his own style, which he works on long into the night.

An art critic named Cremer offers to give Wyatt's exhibition a good review (guaranteeing sales) in exchange for a cut of the profits. (70) Disgusted, Wyatt refuses; in consequence, his paintings get a bad review and don't sell.

This part closes with some more description of France. Napoleon's aspirations to equal Rome in culture and import are mentioned, and Gaddis notes France's spirit of art collecting.

At the opening of Part III, Wyatt and Esther, now in New York, haphazardly decide to get married. (78) There is aquick cut to a year later, where Wyatt and Esther are listening to the radio and Esther asks what Wyatt thinks of her fiction. Wyatt replies somewhat dismissively. (82) Esther tells Wyatt he is going to waste as a copier of blueprints. Wyatt has grown listless and does not work on painting much any longer.

Wyatt is still working on the portrait of his mother and it is a source of tension between him and Esther. Esther believes it is an impediment to his progress as an artist. She also feels that Wyatt's art cuts him off from her. (88) Wyatt and Esther's relationship continues to deteroiate and Esther continues to exhort Wyatt toward some ambition for himself. (96)

In the middle of Part III, Gaddis presents a mosiac of New York, as he did earlier for Paris. After this description Esther turns down an invitation fo a New Year's party for Wyatt's sake. Wyatt's antisocial tendencies are a source of further tension. Otto the playwrite is introduced. (106)

Wyatt and Ester get drunk in a Spanish restaurant. Esther watches Wyatt from afar and sees him acting decisively. He looks manly and arrogant, the way she wishes he was more often, and the waitress compares him to a Flemish soldier (Flamenco). (111)

Later, Otto and Wyatt go on a walk together and Otto finds Wyatt very strange and difficult to talk to. Esther and Otto confide in each other regarding Wyatt's increasing disaffection from the world, and the two of them contemplate an affair. (131)

Quotes


pg. 71 -- The critic Cremer notes that Degas said "the artist must approach his work in the same frame of mind in which the criminal commits his deed."

pg. 74 -- at the bottom of this page Gaddis describes several paintings that have been transformed by being painted over. He describes one in which a man being tortured on a rack is turned to a peaceful interior of a man in bed.

pg. 91 -- Rilke "refused to be psychoanalyzed for fear of purging his genius."

pg. 103 -- Regarding Christmas: "under dead trees and brittle ornaments prehensile hands exchange forgeries of what the heart dare not surrender."

pg. 109 -- "They swayed a little, standing in the doorway, still holding each other together in a way of holding each other back . . . until both, unrealized, come in to shatter coincidentally upon the shore."

pg. 113 -- There is a lengthy paragraph on writing worth re-reading.

pg. 131 -- "Gd crs as mch fr mmnt as fr hr--wht mean?"

Thoughts

* Gaddis goes on at length about France and the role it has played in arts and culture. These descriptions are some of the least accessible thus far, but he seems to be making some worthwhile points.

* Gaddis has a wonderful ability to build the feeling of a character through dialog. The exchange between Esther and Wyatt on pp. 94-97 is particularly good.

* Otto will be a character worth watching. It is as though Otto and Wyatt are both halves of the complete artist. Otto has the ambition but executes his play cluelessly, and ambitionless Wyatt lets his innate ability languish.

* This lament of Esther's cuts deeply: "You . . . even when we make love you don't share it, you do it as though . . . so you can do something sinful . . . Why aren't you a priest? You are a priest! Why aren't you one then, instead of . . . me . . . they don't share anything." (116)

7 Comments:

Blogger DerikB said...

The passage you note on page 74 about the painting that has been painted over is referring to the painting Wyatt did in Germany and then lost. In a conversation with Esther he mentions that his friend "Hans" had asked for it, but that it disappeared. It has been taken, painted over, and passed off as an original.

November 22, 2004 at 12:45 PM  
Blogger Rake said...

Finally caught up on this section--is anyone else sensing the need for a do-over next week?--and I'm wondering if people are (dis)liking the dialogue in TR. I find it kinda tough to scan, at times, but it isn't striking me as artificial, per se. (I do agree that Gaddis can be effective at deepening our understanding of his characters through dialogue, although what I'm beginning to understand is that Wyatt is a miserable bastard, and that I'd much rather live in the world of, say, Russo's Straight Man than in TR, were I presented the choice. I'm pretty happy with Otto, however, functioning as the W. Gaddis manque--he's amusing, but I feel for him, already.)

So.

(Good intro post, BTW.)

November 24, 2004 at 4:50 AM  
Blogger Richard said...

yeah, things have conspired to make me kind of behind, myself, and was wondering if this week would be good for discussion, with the holiday an' stuff...

as for the dialogue, I like it and find his ear remarkable, and how he is able to embody the different characters through their speech...

It's interesting when Ester asks Wyatt why he married her, since he doesn't want to share anything with her, etc... because, it's kind of hard to imagine Wyatt having married anyone, given his preoccupations... yet I like the line on p.79 describing the decision to marry as being perhaps "indecision crystallized, insofar as he was not deciding against it"....

November 24, 2004 at 9:23 AM  
Blogger DerikB said...

I've been fortunately off from work this week, but unfortunately under the weather, so while I have finished the reading I haven't had time to really think about it or make any postable notes. I'm fine with taking an extra week for this one, it might also give us all a chance to get a little ahead.

I'll try to get my thought together for tomorrow.

November 24, 2004 at 12:45 PM  
Blogger gwenda said...

Oh yes, an extra week would be marvelmous.

November 24, 2004 at 2:43 PM  
Blogger dina margabi said...

Into the smoky haze of this GDC foray, my first comment simply has to be about how re-reading resembles painting over another painting, especially where _TR_ is concerned (cf. p.74, cf. p.113). I am re-reading this book and it is surfacing in an entirely new way than the first fragmentary time I tumbled into it some years ago. It'll be a while before the smoke clears in here-- and within my own shocked daze-- so that I might resolve this jarring disphase and hope to be of some articulate value to the Gaddis Stinking Pub.

But at least I can say that I'm here, am listening, and oft raising a glass (the better to see you all through, if not to toast anything in particular).

November 28, 2004 at 6:27 PM  
Blogger DerikB said...

Dina, I like the repainting/rereading analogy. I'm seeing the book a different way this time around too. This slower reading is getting me to be more careful.

November 30, 2004 at 11:52 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home